BFT Financial

Consultive Approach. Individualized Guidance. Personal Relationships.

  • About Us
    • Team + Mission
    • Our Investing Philosophy
  • Why Choose Us?
    • Our Unique Approach
    • Why We’re Different
  • Our Services
    • Financial Planning
    • Asset Management
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Login
    • Clients
    • Financial Professionals

April 20, 2021 By Travis Crowell

Spring Cleaning. Clearing Out the Financial Clutter.

Spring has arrived in Texas. I know this because my back is sore from raking leaves and clearing out gutters. For my family, this time of year is all about taking advantage of the nice weather with soccer games on Saturday mornings, bike rides, and trips to the park. While we enjoy the more fun family activities, the change in season is also a convenient reminder to catch up on necessary activities. Yardwork, testing smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, and replacing air filters. What does this have to do with finance? Regular maintenance is the key to keeping a house in good shape. In the same way, your finances need a few annual tune-ups. It might feel like a pain (like it did when I was doing yard work), but now is an excellent time to get a few essential items done to get your financial house in order.

Clear out the clutter

You should file and keep certain documents, like tax returns and statements for non-qualified brokerage accounts. However, it would be best to shred many of the financial documents you receive, like pay stubs and checks deposited online. Why shred? To protect your information. Yes, it’s an unfortunate reality that your paper documents are susceptible to identify theft, but you don’t have to invest in a commercial level shredder. Several micro-cut shredders are available through an office supply store for less than $100 – which isn’t a bad investment for the protection it provides. 

For those who have gone digital with financial documentation, check your computer files or cloud drives to clean out what you need and permanently delete files you don’t. Many institutions can also archive your statements for years, saving time in managing documents and keeping them in a more secure setting. 

Whether you’re clearing out physical or virtual clutter, it makes it much easier to find what you need in the future.

Annual credit report

Once every 12 months, everyone is entitled to a free credit report check at http://www.annualcreditreport.com. This is the only official website authorized by federal law. Be wary of any other services that pose as the official program and charge a fee. While your report is free, if you want to see your actual credit score, there is a cost at each of the credit bureaus. 

Another place to get your annual report is with your current credit card provider or banking institutions. It’s becoming more popular for financial institutions to partner with the credit bureaus and give customers free credit monitoring and offer ongoing access to your score and annual report. It’s worth checking if you can sign up or if you already have it. 

Annually reviewing your report can help you catch the signs of identity theft early or even discover and fix incorrect information.

Review subscriptions

From food subscription boxes to video streaming, this has to be the year of subscription services. Even before the pandemic, the average person in the U.S. had 12 paid media and entertainment subscriptions. If you live in a multi-generational household, that number could be as high as 17.

There’s a reason so many companies offer a monthly subscription or free trials. It’s easy to forget about it and not realize that you’re being charged month after month. Now is a good time to scroll through your expenses and see what subscription services are charging you each month. Either update the subscription level to an amount you actually use or say goodbye to the ones you don’t. 

Check on your estate plan

First, make sure you know where your essential estate documents are located. Then, review them to see if they need to be updated. Is there a need to change any of the designations you’ve made? Also, be sure to look at your financial accounts because named beneficiaries on accounts or insurance will supersede anything written in a will. If there has been a significant life change (e.g., birth, death, or divorce), there may be a need to update your documents. 

It may go without saying, but if you read this last item and said, “I don’t have an estate plan,” then your annual spring cleaning is more of a yearly to-do list. Having an estate plan is one of the essential items in your financial planning basket, as is having an emergency plan for the home. 

This list is not meant to be exhaustive, but instead a few quick items to help keep your financial house in order after a particularly challenging year. If you run across any questions as you work through the steps, please reach out to your Financial Advisor for help.


DISCLAIMER: The information provided is for educational purposes only. The views expressed here are those of the author and may not represent the views of BFT Financial Group. Neither BFT Financial Group nor the author makes any warranty or representation as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of this information. Please be advised that this content may contain errors, is subject to revision at all times, and should not be relied upon for any purpose. Under no circumstances shall BFT Financial Group be liable to you or anyone else for damage stemming from the use or misuse of this information. Neither BFT or the author offers legal or tax advice. Please consult the appropriate professional regarding your individual circumstance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Filed Under: FInancial Planning, Retirement Planning

April 14, 2021 By BFT Financial

Financial Update | April 2021

Listen to the brief audio version or read the full overview below.

A Volatile But Positive Quarter for Equity Markets

March turned out to be another volatile month for equity markets. The continued rise in U.S. bond yields continued to put pressure on equity markets, especially on higher valued growth stocks.

The sharp sell-off in U.S. Treasuries since the start of the year raised hopes that the Federal Reserve (Fed) would take a more active role in calming markets. They did not do that, disappointing financial markets. Instead, Jay Powell (Chairman of the Board of the Federal Reserve Bank) stressed that the Fed takes a broad view of financial conditions and that they remain highly accommodative, justifying the Fed’s current stance.

Moreover, he stressed that the economy is still far from meeting conditions that would warrant tighter monetary policy. He highlighted the fact that the unemployment rate is still high and that it will take time for the U.S. economy to recover properly.

The good news is that the economy is recovering as evidenced by economic data. Helped by the economic stimulus combined with the vaccination drive, the global economy should continue rebound over the course of the year, with momentum rotating from the US to the rest of the world.

The approval of the American Rescue Plan by congress also stoked fears that the additional $1.9 trillion of stimulus will lead to much higher inflation. U.S. households were sitting on around $1.7 trillion in excess savings as of the end of January. Households generated about two-thirds of those excess savings by cutting back on spending during the pandemic, with the remaining one-third stemming from stimulus payments.

It is estimated that the latest stimulus bill will boost household savings by an additional $300 billion, bringing the stock of excess savings to $2 trillion by April. As the lockdown measures ease, it is reasonable to assume that households will spend a portion of this cash cushion.

Unlike President Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Biden’s American Rescue Plan Act will raise the incomes of the poor much more than the rich. Since the poor tend to spend a greater share of each dollar of disposable income than the rich, aggregate demand could rise meaningfully.

Well, who’s afraid of a little inflation? Certainly not the Fed.

Consumer prices will rise “well in excess” of 2.5% before settling back, Robert Kaplan (President of Dallas branch of Federal Reserve Bank) said, adding that the Dallas branch forecasts GDP growth of around 6.5% this year. Charles Evans (President of Chicago branch of Federal Reserve Bank) also downplayed inflation of 2.5%, saying even 3% “would be welcome, actually” for some period. He reiterated that rising bond yields is a sign of economic optimism.

Chairman Powell also reiterated that the Fed views the upcoming inflationary spike as transitory and will not justify a change in Fed policy. Powell’s recent speeches highlighted that while Fed policy will remain accommodative for an extended period, the central bank will not attempt to micromanage fluctuations in long-dated bond yields.

Is the Federal Reserve’s Relaxed View Towards Inflation Risk
Justified?

The Fed knows full well that headline inflation could temporarily reach 4% over the next two months due to base effects from last year’s economic shock, supply chain disruptions, the rebound in oil prices, and the lagged effect from dollar weakness. However, as it did in late 2011, when headline inflation nearly hit 4% and producer price inflation briefly topped 10%, the Fed is inclined to regard these price shocks as transitory. The Fed believes that headline inflation will tick up to 2.4% this year but then settle back down to 2% by the end of next year as most fiscal stimulus measures end.

Our view is that the Fed will be right about inflation in the near term, but that it could be wrong in the long term. That is to say, we think that core inflation will probably remain subdued for the next two years, as the Fed expects. However, inflation could rise significantly towards the middle of the decade, an outcome that is likely to surprise both the Fed and financial markets.

Stocks usually outperform bonds when economic growth is strong, and money is cheap. The end of the pandemic and ongoing fiscal stimulus should support growth this and next year, allowing the bull market to continue. With inflation slow to rise, monetary policy will remain accommodative over this period.

The recent back-up in long-term bond yields could destabilize stocks for a month or two. However, as long as yields do not rise enough to trigger a recession, stocks will shrug off their effect. Over the coming 6 to 12 months, a comparatively sanguine perspective on inflation supports a bullish view on stock markets.

End of the Pandemic

Over the past 6 weeks, the U.S. has continued to make incredible progress in vaccinating its population against COVID-19.

The pace of vaccination is now well within the range required for herd immunity to be in place by the end of the third quarter. If this pace continues at an average of 2.5 million doses per day, the U.S. will have vaccinated 90% of its population by the end of September. And these calculations assume the continuation of a two-dose regime, meaning that the rollout of Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine – which requires only one dose and has shown to be extremely effective at preventing severe illness and death – could shorten the time to herd immunity rates of vaccination among adults even further.

The situation is clearly different in Europe. The vaccination progress in several European countries is well behind that of the U.S. and the UK, and per capita new cases in the euro area have again risen significantly above that of the U.S.

Clean Energy, Infrastructure and Commodities

Last week’s unveiling of President Biden’s $2.4 trillion “American Jobs Plan” to modernize U.S. infrastructure is the biggest construction and highway upgrade since the 1950s. Spending will take place over 8 years, financed in part by an increase in corporate taxes. This will provide a short-term boost to growth and is positive for equity markets as investors expected the tax component and the spending is front-loaded while the tax increases are spread out over 15 years.

The proposal is not pure old economy – it includes $650B for green infrastructure, clean water and high-speed broadband, along with $180B for the biggest non-defense Research and Development program on record. The proposal has a high likelihood of passage before the end of the year given that infrastructure is popular and Democrats can pass the bill via reconciliation with zero Republican votes.

The plan will create jobs but will likely also need a lot of base commodities from iron ore for railroads to copper and lithium for upgrading the broadband grid.

The past 10 years have been rough for commodity investors. After a decade-long bull market in the early 2000s, major commodity indices have continuously underperformed equities. The question now is what to expect going forward?

The conditions that propelled natural resource prices in the early half of the 2000s are very different from today. Back then, China’s economic expansion was a major tailwind. Fast forward to today, China is prioritizing stability over growth.

However, another tailwind for commodities is emerging. Alongside preventing financial risks, Chinese policymakers are also prioritized the environment. This is consistent with global efforts to adopt greener technologies. Somewhat ironically, it implies greater demand for commodities – industrial metals in particular – to buildout power grids.

The global movement toward a low-carbon renewable-energy future is a key factor underpinning metals demand over the next decade. The U.S., E.U. and China have committed to net-zero carbon targets by 2050 / 2060. This will unleash immense investment into and restructuring of everything from energy grids to city design to even bitcoin mining. Advances in renewable costs likely mean oil and coal are on their way out.

This comes after years of low capital investment in metals and mining. The confluence of supply constraints and rising demand will ultimately drive-up commodity prices.

Bond Portfolios are Suffering

Global bond markets are experiencing one of their worst starts of the year and are down circa 4%. Given the low interest rates, it is hard to see how global fixed income can generate a positive return this year.

Interest rates continue to tick higher on the back of solid economic data. There is a self-limiting aspect though to how high bond yields can rise when inflation is subdued. Higher bond yields lead to tighter financial conditions. Tighter financial conditions, in turn, lead to weaker growth, which justifies an even longer period of low rates. It is only when inflation rises to a level that central banks find uncomfortable that tighter financial conditions become desirable. We are far from that level today.

However, sharply falling bond yields are also not in the cards, so being short duration and owning corporate bonds and emerging market debt in our fixed income portfolios is helping us to create outperformance.

Investment Implications

Equities might face some more near-term volatility stemming from the recent rise in bond yields. But our core view is that the “Goldilocks” environment for risk assets, where growth is strong, inflation is contained, and monetary policy is accommodative, should last another two years. We expect corporate earnings to grow healthily this year and next, and strong earnings will continue to underpin the global equity markets.

Value stocks could lead the equity market higher over the next 12 months. The pandemic benefited growth names, especially in the tech space. The end of lockdown measures will favor value names. Not only is value still cheap in comparison to growth, but traditional value sectors such as banks and energy companies have seen stronger upward earnings revisions than tech stocks since the start of the year.

Looking further ahead, the cyclical bull market in stocks could end when inflation rises so high that central banks are forced to tighten monetary policy. While this is not a near-term risk, it is a major risk for the middle of the decade and beyond. Inflation is often slow to rise in response to an overheated economy, but when it does rise, it can rise fast.

Investors looking to hedge long-term inflation risk should favor inflation-protected securities over nominal bonds, precious metals and commodities, and they should.


PLEASE READ THIS WARNING: This newsletter contains general information that may not be suitable for everyone.
The information contained herein should not be construed as personalized investment advice. Past performance is no
guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this newsletter will come
to pass. Investing in the stock market involves gains and losses and may not be suitable for all investors. Information
presented herein is subject to change without notice and should not be considered as a solicitation to buy or sell any security.

Exchange Traded Funds (ETF’s) are sold by prospectus. Please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and
expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus, which contains this and other information about the investment
company, can be obtained from the Fund Company or your financial professional. Be sure to read the prospectus carefully before deciding whether to invest.

*Investments in commodities may have greater volatility than investments in traditional securities, particularly if the
instruments involve leverage. The value of commodity-linked derivative instruments may be affected by changes in
overall market movements, commodity index volatility, changes in interest rates or factors affecting a particular
industry or commodity, such as drought, floods, weather, livestock disease, embargoes, tariffs and international
economic, political and regulatory developments. Use of leveraged commodity-linked derivatives creates an
opportunity for increased return but, at the same time, creates the possibility for greater loss.

Investing internationally carries additional risks such as differences in financial reporting, currency exchange risk, as
well as economic and political risk unique to the specific country. This may result in greater share price volatility. Shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 (S&P 500) is an unmanaged group of securities considered to be representative of the
stock market in general.  It is a market value weighted index with each stock’s weight in the index proportionate to its market value.

A REIT is a security that sells like a stock on the major exchanges and invests in real estate directly, either through
properties or mortgages. REITs receive special tax considerations and typically offer investors high yields, as well as a
highly liquid method of investing in real estate.  There are risks associated with these types of investments and
include but are not limited to the following:  Typically no secondary market exists for the security listed above. 
Potential difficulty discerning between routine interest payments and principal repayment.  Redemption price of a REIT
may be worth more or less than the original price paid.  Value of the shares in the trust will fluctuate with the portfolio
of underlying real estate.  Involves risks such as refinancing in the real estate industry, interest rates, availability of
mortgage funds, operating expenses, cost of insurance, lease terminations, potential economic and regulatory
changes.  This is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation or an offer to buy the securities described herein.  The offering is made only by the Prospectus.

Filed Under: Quarterly Updates

March 9, 2021 By Stephen Tally

March 2021 Financial Update

When Good News Becomes Bad News

Just like in January, global markets gave up most of their gains in the last few days of February this time because of rising bond yields, which made the market nervous.

What is important to note that it was not only U.S. Treasury yields that rose but also the European and Chinese bond yields, so it was a global sell off in government bonds.

Why Did the Equity Market Get Rattled by Rising Bond Yields?

Normally rising bond yields are an indication of strong economic growth, which should be positive for equity markets. However, historically, rising yields have been negative for stock valuations when yields increased in response to hawkish central bank rhetoric. This is clearly not the case today. The Fed’s accommodative stance should limit any near-term upward pressure on U.S. bond yields. Therefore, we continue to favor equities over a 12-month horizon.

This equity and bond market sell off was triggered by fears that all the fiscal and monetary stimulus will lead to much higher inflation, which would force the Fed to raise interest rates and tighten monetary policy, which in turn would put pressure on stock market valuations, especially on stocks with high valuation multiples. That is the reason why for example the NASDAQ dropped more than the Dow Jones Index.

Rising Yields and Inflation

We expect U.S. inflation to move higher over the coming months. Oil prices have risen 70% since the end of October and rising energy prices will likely push up headline inflation. In addition, the effect from a weaker dollar should translate into higher goods prices in the U.S.

A stronger labor market and a slower pace of rent forgiveness should also boost housing inflation. If we add everything together, we think there is a risk that headline inflation in the US could temporarily rise to 3 to 4% in the coming months, which would increase the long-term inflation expectations and could again lead to a short-term increase in bond yields, which could cause another scare in the equity market.

Fiscal stimulus could further supercharge demand, adding to inflationary pressures. The impending passage of the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Act, combined with the economic stimulus packages from 2020 brings the total fiscal support to almost 25% of U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which is arguably larger than the economic damage caused by the pandemic.

However, we think this increase in inflation numbers will be temporary as the economy is still in recovery mode. So, we do believe Fed chairman Powell when he says the Fed is planning not to take any action for the next two years. If the Fed sticks to that plan, then the economic stimulus will support corporate earnings.

We have to remember that inflation is not necessarily bad for equity markets. Deflation is bad for stocks, just as is high inflation. Somewhere between deflation and inflation, however, lies reflation. Reflation is good for stocks. We are currently in a reflationary zone, where inflation expectations have risen but not by enough to force the Fed to tighten monetary policy.

A period of ultra-easy monetary policy can sow the seeds for economic overheating, rising inflation, and ultimately, much higher interest rates. Since this is precisely what happened in the 1970s, it is prudent to ask whether something like that could happen again. Investors today certainly do not believe a replay of the 1970s is in the cards. Yet, we would argue that a 1970s-style inflationary episode is at least a risk we need to keep in mind.

While no two periods are exactly the same, there are a number of striking similarities between the late 1960s and today. As is the case today, fiscal policy was highly expansionary back then. The same goes for monetary policy: just like today, the Fed kept interest rates well below the growth rate of the economy. In the 1960s, the Federal Reserve was still focused on avoiding a repeat of the Great Depression and the deflationary wave that accompanied it. Today, the Fed is equally focused on reflating the economy.

As long as the economy is growing solidly and the Fed remains on the sidelines, it is too early for investors to sell out of equities. Instead, equity investors should favor sectors that could benefit from higher inflation. Looking further out, the secular bull market in stocks will end when inflation rises to a level that the Fed cannot ignore. That day will arrive, but probably not for another two years.

Pandemic Subsiding

We cannot yet declare victory over COVID-19 but it is clearly going in the right direction as new case counts have plummeted from their January peak. Restrictions helped turn the tide in Europe, albeit at the cost of cutting off oxygen to the economy, but even in Sweden and the U.S., which avoided EU-style restrictions, the virus has lost momentum. The roll-out of the vaccines will help to suppress another flare up of the virus and supports our view that economies will be able to open up sustainably within the next three months. The potential for vaccine-resistant variants is a concern, but the pandemic news is clearly trending in the right direction.

Why This Time It is Different

The global economy has seen two significant crises in the space of a dozen years. The monetary policy response to both events has been substantially identical; the Fed swiftly cut the fed funds rate back to zero and started buying large amounts of Treasury and agency securities to support market liquidity.

The fiscal response has been dramatically different, however, with governments this time seemingly not concerned at all by borrowing large amounts of money to finance the economic stimulus plans.

Therefore, the outlook is quite different today compared to 2010 as central banks have gained a powerful and willing partner in their efforts to combat the damage wrought by a sudden shock. Pandemic fiscal stimulus initiatives have dwarfed the fiscal efforts after the Global Financial Crisis across the major economies. Once Congress passes the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Act, the U.S. will have doubled down on its 2020 initiatives, committing to aid equivalent to an extraordinary 25% of its annual output. The ultimate effect on inflation, interest rates and exchange rates remain to be seen, but it is clear that the post-pandemic economic recovery will not unfold in the same way as in the past decade.

The Difference

From 1966 until 1997, U.S. equity prices were negatively correlated with U.S. Treasury yields. Since 1997, U.S. share prices have been positively correlated with US government bond yields. We believe we are now in the process of a major paradigm shift in the stock-bond correlation, reverting to the pre-1997 relationship.

The positive correlation between share prices and US bond yields – that has been in place since 1997 – is likely to turn negative, which effectively means that stock prices will fall when U.S. bond yields rise and will rally when Treasury yields drop. The reason is that the market will shift its focus from seeing deflation as the major risk to seeing higher inflation as the main macro risk. Investment strategies and frameworks that have worked over the past 24 years might require modifications as balanced portfolios that only hold equities and fixed income might not provide sufficient diversification in this macro climate.

What Happened in 1997?

In case you are wondering what happened in 1997: The basis for the 1997 reversal in the stock-bond correlation was a regime shift in the global macro backdrop. Before 1997, the main risk to business cycles and share prices was inflation. From 1997 until very recently, the main risk to equity markets was deflation or very low inflation. The watershed event that triggered this global macro shift from inflation to deflation was the Asian Crisis in 1997. The Asian currency devaluations allowed local producers – operating in these large manufacturing hubs – to cut their export prices in US dollar terms. The price reductions unleashed deflationary forces that spread all over the world.

The Impact on the USD

The Fed’s accommodative stance should limit any near-term upward pressure on the U.S. dollar. Whereas stocks are most sensitive to absolute changes in long-term real bond yields, the dollar is more sensitive to changes in short-term real rate differentials with U.S. trading partners. Since the Fed is unlikely to tighten monetary policy anytime soon, U.S. short-term real rates could fall further as inflation rises.

The Fed falling behind the inflation curve is fundamentally bearish for the U.S. dollar. That is why the primary trend for the dollar remains down. However, the dollar is oversold, and a short-term rebound is possible, especially if U.S. bond yields continue to rise, triggering a period of risk-off in global financial markets.

Investment Strategy

Given these conclusions, we recommend the following investment stance over the next 12 months: Stay positive on equities, which will generate excess returns over government bonds and cash in the absence of a negative COVID surprise.

Despite the high valuations of growth stocks, we favor a balanced approach as we expect corporate earnings to remain strong this year, also for growth stocks. We could see periods of rising bond yields which will create short-term fears and corrections in the markets. But we think bond yields will not rise sustainably this year and the monetary backdrop will remain supportive for equity valuations.

Longer-Term Investment Strategy

Relatively higher equity valuations means that a lot of good news is already discounted in prices and that means the equity rally is entering a riskier period where short-term corrections become more likely. Share prices will advance when U.S. bond yields drop, and they will dip when Treasury yields rise. As and when share prices drop due to concerns about higher inflation, the Fed will attempt to calm investors arguing that inflation is transitory, and it knows how to deal with it. Stocks and bonds will likely rally on reassurances of this kind.

Commodities

We are following commodities and may favor holding a position in precious metals and base commodities as a long-term diversification in a multi-asset portfolio.

Base metals prices have rallied by over 50% in dollar terms since last year’s COVID-induced meltdown. Nevertheless, we see further upside in metals prices, with the potential to develop into a multi-year structural bull market. The key driver is the world’s decisive push to a greener future, which in turn will significantly boost demand for several key base metals used in new energy infrastructure.

Although the world’s awareness of climate change has been increasing over the past several decades, 2020 became a pivotal year as major countries affirmed their commitment with concrete and measurable targets. The EU and Japan announced last year that they are striving for net zero greenhouse gas emission by 2050, while China is aiming for the decade after.

In the U.S., President Joe Biden also intends to set the U.S. on a path to net zero emissions by 2050 and has issued an executive order to rejoin the Paris Climate Accord, alongside other actions in favor of environmental policies. To meet the ambitious goals outlined in the Paris Agreement, governments need to implement aggressive efforts focused on improving energy efficiency, decarbonizing the power sector, switching to low or zero-carbon fuels, and utilizing carbon-capture technologies. These efforts could profoundly change energy infrastructure and consumption patterns in the coming decades.

In short, the combination of regulatory, financial, and social incentives points to an acceleration in the development of green infrastructure, including the construction of solar and wind energy power plants and electrification of vehicles, many of which are heavy consumers of copper and some other base metals. This holds the promise of significantly boosting demand for these resources.

China’s demand for copper has been strong in the past several decades, and still holds the key in the near future. While the country’s transportation infrastructure has vastly improved, its campaign to build “new infrastructure” on the digitalization of its economy has just begun. The country has laid out ambitious plans to expand its 5G network and data centers, all of which are heavy consumers of copper.

Portfolios

Global Equity markets performed strongly up till the last week of February when the rising bond yields created a sell-off which wiped out most of last month’s gains. Our balanced approach in portfolios of combining value with momentum worked well.

As bond yields have been rising globally, bonds didn’t have a great start of the year. Global fixed income markets are down 2.5% since the start of the year while equity markets are up 1.5%. Which means that fixed income heavy portfolios are lagging. Non-qualified models have benefitted from municipal bond holdings as they have fared better than their treasury counterparts. Qualified models will see the return of senior floating rate bank notes to the lineup after a short absence. The potential for rising rates and the low duration associated with senior notes make them a favorable addition.

Filed Under: News, Quarterly Updates

February 5, 2021 By BFT Financial

BFT Financial Market Update: Q4 2020

Listen to the brief audio version or read the full overview below.

Twelve months after the first reports of a new virus started to show up and ten months after the start of a global pandemic, there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna seem to have efficacy rates of around 95%. AstraZeneca’s vaccine, developed together with Oxford University, has shown an efficacy rate of 90%. Russia and China have also launched vaccines. The Russian vaccine, Gamaleya, displayed an efficacy rate of 91% based on 22,000 test participants. Such high efficacy rates are on par with the measles and smallpox vaccines, and well above the typical 30%-to-50% success rate for the seasonal flu vaccine.

If we combine the global roll-out of the vaccines with the typical cycle of previous viral pandemics, we could very well see a sharp drop in new Covid cases in the coming months. When effective vaccines allow everyone to live a normal life again, there will be a burst of economic activity of every kind. When this happens, it will unlock tremendous pent-up demand around the world. There will be party booms, travel booms, shopping malls will be filled with people and airports will be busy again.

The Covid-19 crisis is a natural disaster and historically, the impact of this kind of crisis on the economy and society is always “temporary”. This time is no different. The speed of the economic rebound since April has been fast and surprised many investors. Retail sales in the U.S. and Europe have not only clawed back all their lost ground but have made new highs.

Another reason for a recovery boom is that, although the Covid-19 crisis is a
temporary shock, it has caused structural shifts in policy. This will make the
recovery story very different from the post-2009 recovery. Back then, the world economy was plagued by a badly damaged banking system in the West, prolonged deleveraging, and a crash in Chinese investment spending. This led to a long period of low growth, sustained deflationary threat and a secular bear market in commodities.

A Roaring 2020s?

The 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic gave way to the roaring 1920s, business boomed, stocks roared ahead, and the world economy experienced unprecedented prosperity. Is there a chance that we will see a repeat with a roaring 2020s?

This is certainly possible as all the economic and monetary stimulus most likely has extended the economic cycle and the secular bull market by another few years.

The path is already well greased with liquidity, and the current economic backdrop bears some similarities to the 1920s. Back then, there were many game-changing new technologies and innovations such as electricity, the automobile, the telephone, radio, consumer appliances, assembly-line production and so on. These new developments played major roles in driving down inflation and stimulating growth, which led to rising profits and stock prices until it abruptly ended in 1929.

Today, corporate profits are recovering strongly from the recession last year and stocks are trading at a forward Price/Earnings Ratio (P/E) of 22, which is not low but also not overly expensive by historical standards, especially taking into account the much lower interest rates. This is not to mention the many important technological advances in recent decades.

Obviously, there are key differences between the 1920s and now. More than a century ago, Americans were younger, and the economy was more vibrant and growing faster. Today, the population is getting older, the economy invests a lot less and growth is much slower. However, these differences are not the reasons preventing a financial mania. There are already areas of speculation, but we must differentiate between pockets of speculation like stocks of electric car makers or bitcoin, and the general market. We are nowhere near a general financial mania yet.

If we get a roaring 2020s, when and how could it end?

We could see an extended bull market in risk assets until we see the next financial recession, which could be triggered by monetary tightening. Almost all previous asset bubbles were pricked by monetary tightening. If the Fed is serious about its forward guidance, rates are likely to stay low for a few years, which is the key reason why the market could run up a lot further and could lead to asset bubbles and financial manias this decade.

But be careful: policymakers can change their minds quickly and the risk to equity prices will escalate when the Fed is preparing to “normalize” policy again. However, this likely still several years down the road.

The world economy is recovering fast but governments and central banks are still worried about a “double dip” for the economy given the continued lockdowns and they will continue approving large economic stimulus packages. The U.S. has just agreed another fiscal package of around $900 billion, while the EU will push through its own €750 billion recovery fund.

Politically, the right thing to do is to give more money to the most affected people, but for the U.S. economy as whole, additional income subsidy might not be necessary to sustain the recovery. A large part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) expired at the end of July but the unemployment rate has continued to fall and the economy has continued to improve. Additional fiscal support in the U.S. or Europe will simply add more fuel to the potential spending recovery.

The Democratic wins in the Georgia senate races will also give the Biden-Harris administration more leeway to get larger economic stimulus packages through congress and investors do not need to fear a premature tightening of fiscal policy in the U.S.

Several European countries will hold elections this year or early 2022, which means politicians have very little incentive to stop the economic stimulus any time soon.

Fiscal policy around the world has been so far focused on giving out income support for people, but the emphasis could shift to rebuilding the economy. As such, infrastructure spending could be increased significantly from the U.S. to Europe to Asia, fueling a surge in construction activity. This could be good news for commodity prices. And indirectly emerging markets.

Our overall view is therefore that the global economy will strengthen in 2021 as the pandemic winds down. Inflation will remain low for the next 2-to-3 years before possibly moving higher by the middle of the decade.

Interest rates should stay low as long as there is no real inflation threat, and this is positive for equity markets. Right now, stocks are technically overbought and vulnerable to a short-term correction. Nevertheless, investors should continue to favour equities over bonds in 2021 given the likelihood that earnings will accelerate while monetary policy stays accommodative. If social instability in the U.S. would affect the markets in the short-term, we would be more inclined to buy the dip rather than sell.

Given the strong divergence in markets last year with large cap tech stocks accounting for most of the gains, it is not unlikely that we will see some mean-reversion this year and last year’s losers could be this year’s winners.

In 2021, international stocks could outperform US stocks, small caps can outperform large caps and banks and industrial companies can catch up to large cap tech. A weaker dollar will also help to make international markets more attractive.

Bond yields could rise modestly this year on the back of an improving economy, but the move is unlikely to be very large as central banks will want to avoid the situation that fast rising bond yields would hurt the recovering economy.

Investment grade bonds remain preferential to treasuries as we continue to view credit risk as a better alternative to rate risk. Given the rise in inflation expectations (which is not the same as inflation), inflation-protected securities may be attractive as well.

The US dollar will likely continue to weaken in 2021. The collapse in US interest rate differentials versus its trading partners, stronger global growth, and a widening US trade deficit are all bearish for the dollar.

Positive Risk In 2021

There is a ‘risk’ that stocks rise much more than investor can imagine and mega-cap growth stocks continue to lead the way. A liquidity tsunami is still in the making and major central banks except China are working in overdrive to print money and monetize debt. Next year, Quantitative Easing (Q.E.) will likely be significantly enlarged.

The U.S. Treasury will likely issue $2.4 trillion in new debt, and a large part of the new issuance will be absorbed by the Federal Reserve. This means that the Fed’s balance sheet will continue to grow, particularly if they try to keep bond yields down.

All this newly created money will not create inflation in the short-term, but it will flow into stocks, real estate and anything that has some yield, or into momentum plays like bitcoin.

In the meantime, there are captivating growth stories in the technology, biotech and clean energy space, which could easily capture investors’ imagination and generate more inflows into these sectors.

The price pattern of Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Google (FAANGs) is very similar to the financial mania in technology, media and telecom in the 1990s. These mega-cap names are natural hot spots for investors to deploy large amounts of liquid capital. At the height of the last technology bubble, the average annual return for the S&P500 was 30% from 1996 to 1999.

Geopolitical Risks

Beijing has been the key source of negative shocks to risk assets in recent years. Policymakers in China are fixated on their Debt-Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio and have taken every opportunity of the economic recovery to hammer. Next to that China has taken a firmer stand regarding Taiwan and the South China sea and this has the potential to lead to conflicts.

The announcement from Iran that they will start to enrich more uranium will increase tension not only with the U.S. but also Europe.  The recent seizure of a South Korean tanker could be the start of more tensions in the Middle East.

Geopolitical risks could lead to sharp corrections in equity markets but are unlikely to unsettle the underlying economic trends.

Emerging Markets Transition to a Structural Bull Market

The current macro environment surrounding emerging market assets shares some similarities to what happened after the U.S. tech bubble bust two decades ago. Emerging market assets were battered by multiple crises in the 1990s and became deeply undervalued and under-owned. The Fed eased aggressively to fight the deflationary shock, which pushed down the dollar and released massive liquidity into the global financial system. This, together with strong Chinese growth, created a spectacular bull market in emerging market that lasted until after the Global Financial Crisis in 2008.

While history never repeats itself and it is overly simplistic to draw historical parallels, financial markets are subject to long-term mean reversion. The fact that emerging market equities have underperformed developed markets by so much in the past decade and are trading at much more lower multiples holds the promise of higher returns over the long run.

In addition, a few important factors suggest that the cyclical emerging market bull market has the potential to develop into a multi-year structural one.

First, the ongoing rally in commodity prices likely reflects more than just the Fed easing and a weaker dollar. Rather, it could be a sign of a demand-supply mismatch. On the demand side, China is full-throttle supporting the development of the country’s booming new energy vehicles (NEVs) industry, aiming to double its market share in auto sales in five years, which requires aggressive investment in related infrastructure. The country is also pushing development of “new infrastructure” such as 5G stations, high-voltage power grids, intra-city rail transitand data centers, all of which are commodity intensive undertakings.

In addition, China’s “belt and road initiative” has suffered a setback due to U.S.- China tensions and the pandemic but will inevitably continue to gain momentum in the coming years. The belt and road initiative is essentially a series of basic transportation infrastructure projects in developing countries financed by Chinese institutions.

Meanwhile, the U.S. under a Biden presidency will also likely push on infrastructure development, setting the stage for stronger demand for commodities.

On the supply side, a decade-long bear market in commodity prices has significantly reduced capital spending in mining.

Investment in infrastructure and clean energy technology is a trend that will continue in the coming years.

Portfolios

In previous years, we’ve been more inclined to tactically reallocate portfolios to meet changes in the economic cycle and market attitude. This year was a return to traditional rebalancing of portfolios and a harvesting of profits and purchase of lesser performing assets. The result, our portfolios have remained globally diversified and maintained have their weightings. As such, we have participated in the “stay at home” tech momentum and have benefitted from strengthening foreign companies as well. While value hasn’t kept pace with growth for some number of quarters it has been profitable and the past few trading sessions it has been the benefactor of a slight sell off in growth and big tech stocks. Should that continue we are positioned to benefit as well. Our attitude on bonds is reflected in our positioning; we are satisfied to collect the yield, albeit lowered, and not stretch for more than is realistic. Our risk exposure is derived from our equity positioning and shouldn’t be enhanced with a reach for yield.


Disclaimers: This newsletter contains general information that may not be suitable for everyone. The information contained herein should not be construed as personalized investment advice. Past performance is no
guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this newsletter will come to pass. Investing in the stock market involves gains and losses and may not be suitable for all investors. Information presented herein is subject to change without notice and should not be considered as a solicitation to buy or sell any security.

Exchange Traded Funds (ETF’s) are sold by prospectus. Please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus, which contains this and other information about the investment company, can be obtained from the Fund Company or your financial professional. Be sure to read the prospectus carefully before deciding whether to invest.

*Investments in commodities may have greater volatility than investments in traditional securities, particularly if the instruments involve leverage. The value of commodity-linked derivative instruments may be affected by changes in overall market movements, commodity index volatility, changes in interest rates or factors affecting a particular industry or commodity, such as drought, floods, weather, livestock disease, embargoes, tariffs and international economic, political and regulatory developments. Use of leveraged commodity-linked derivatives creates an opportunity for increased return but, at the same time, creates the possibility for greater loss.

Indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index. Unless otherwise noted, performance of indices do not account for any fees, commissions or other expenses that would be incurred.  Returns do not include reinvested dividends.

Filed Under: News, Quarterly Updates

December 22, 2020 By Stephen Tally

2020 Message from BFT Financial CEO Stephen Tally

There have been some interesting years, some challenging years, some sad years, and lots of really good years in my career as an advisor. This year has been all those things. The “good” comment probably sounds outlandish but be patient; I’ll get there.  

The Interesting Part

2020 was interesting from the perspective of a student on the market. Never in history has the market fallen so far so fast. Twenty-two trading days from peak to trough. Similarly, we had a meteoric recovery thanks in part to the tech industry’s ingenuity, whose products and developments kept the country open and moving. I don’t know how we could have managed this year without email and web-based communication technology like Zoom (which I hope doesn’t replace meeting face to face). We’ve not learned all of the lessons from this year (I doubt we’re even close), but we did galvanize some of the ideals we’ve believed in all these years: 

  • Know your risk budget and don’t overspend it 
  • News makes waves while fundamentals drive markets
  • Jumping off a moving roller coaster normally doesn’t end well   

The Hard Part

I don’t know many who haven’t had some amount of difficulty this year. It’s common, and I’d imagine that we could say that every year, but this year just seems even more so. Being isolated from one another is a terrible thing. Being quarantined is one thing, but COVID did more than keep us at home.  Our daughter contracted COVID early on, and the stress of her being sick with a virus that we knew little about and not being to see her and take care of her was terrible. Thankfully, she recovered in short order. Many didn’t battle COVID directly but were affected, nonetheless. Some lost jobs. Some lost businesses. The lucky ones struggled with working remotely for the first time. The even less lucky worked from home and became their children’s teachers.  

The Sad Part

For some, 2020 brought sadness that will not quickly wear away. You lost loved ones, and maybe you couldn’t say goodbye or have closure from a service or celebration of life. We all lost precious time – with aging parents, with family, and with friends. We’ve seen people struggle with isolation and depression and had little or no opportunity to help. Our places of worship closed. Our charities suffered.  Many simply did with less, or worse, without. We’ll heal, and with time and a cure, we will all be able to move past.

The Good Part

I recently said something about being positive, which made my wife chuckle. It’s easy to see me as negative if you don’t take a closer look—my career centers on risk analysis and reduction. I can’t afford to be naive or oblivious to what may go wrong. But it doesn’t mean my glass is half empty. It’s quite the opposite. I believe life is good, and things work out the way they’re supposed to. 

My life is filled with my Dad’s words – “You can figure it out,” “Just solve the problem,” “Work on it and it’ll come to you,” and his famous, “I can hit that shot.” That last one, not so much! I also believe that we are at our best when it’s the worst. I see more people walking in my neighborhood than ever before. I see parents in the yard playing with kids. What an opportunity parents have, albeit it may be a pinch at times.  

Never in my lifetime have I seen the entire world work to solve the same problem. I hope this cooperation continues to germinate. Quarantining has made me realize how truly blessed I am to have such a fantastic family and group of friends. I do miss them all so much. I miss all of you too. I’m lucky that you all are such a great bunch and a treat to work with. I hope we exit this time with a deeper value of one another, and a desire to be more engaging in a personal way and less of a technological way. A call is better than a text and not as good as seeing you in person.  

Personal Notes from 2020

Kelley and I bought a place in Fairplay, Colorado a couple of years ago. It’s in a high valley in the middle of nowhere. It reminds me of my childhood home on the ranch. We‘ve been able to spend much more time there than we’d ever thought. We’d drive up on a Saturday and plugin on Monday and work there for the week. Kelley is much better at working remotely than I. No matter the number of hours or tasks completed, if I’m not at the office at my desk, I feel unproductive. It’s silly, I know.

Our oldest daughter and her husband moved back after years of being away. Nine, to be exact. David finished his obligation with the Army discharging honorably as a Captain. Kelsey is teaching again but decided not to coach volleyball this year. She was previously the head coach at the Americas High School in El Paso. David started completely anew with JP Morgan as an investment banking analyst. I’ve yet to wrangle any of my kids into the business. They’re expecting their first child in February. He’ll be our first grandchild. Kelley has completely lost her mind, and I’m worn out from playing it cool. Again, silly.

Allie, our younger daughter, is the family COVID champion. It’ll be a cool story someday. She started working at American Airlines last fall as a price analyst. She was nervous for a bit but being the smart, hardworking employee she is, she’s not only retained her job but instead moved to the pricing group for Europe. She downplays it, but we’re proud to see her working her way up. If we can only get Auntie A to move back to the Ft. Worth side of the metroplex, all would be right.

I performed my third wedding ceremony this year. The first was my best friend Michael from college. The second my daughter Kelsey, and the third Stephen Walden and his bride Bailey. Little Stephen is the son of my best childhood friend, Todd (I’m big Stephen). It was such a fun experience. I’ve known Stephen since he was a baby, actually since before he was born; and to be a part of his growing family means something to me, I can’t quite put into words.  

2021 Resolution Goals

I’m not one to make resolutions, but I do always set goals. Maybe there’s a difference, and perhaps there isn’t. I haven’t sat down and made the official list yet, but I can share some things that easily make the list.

  • Spend more time with family and friends  
  • Focus on health.  I refer to this COVID filled year as “the taco season.”
  • Less TV
  • Explore more

In Parting

I really enjoy Christmas. I love the memories most. Being little, Mom and Dad taking us to Thorton’s department store to look at the window decorations, and then up the escalator to see Santa. Trying to stay in bed Christmas morning past 5:00. Adopting a family and giving gifts to others. Decorating the tree for the first time with my new wife and daughters. Getting gifts for the kids they really wanted, or better yet, things they didn’t expect and loved. Mexican food on Christmas Eve at Mom and Dad’s. I smile thinking about it all.

Christmas isn’t just about the celebration; it always brings me to my faith. My beliefs are fundamental to who I am. Know that I have lifted you all up repeatedly this past year, asking that you be protected, healthy, and unaffected. I’ve asked that for all of us. I’ve asked that we navigate not only this virus but the contentiousness of the election. I pray that you find peace and happiness. 

I wish all of you well, and what struggles you may have or have had subsided. It’s a season of hope. I hope we all have a great 2021!

Stephen

DISCLAIMER: The information provided is for educational purposes only. The views expressed here are those of the author and may not represent the views of BFT Financial Group. Neither BFT Financial Group nor the author makes any warranty or representation as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of this information. Please be advised that this content may contain errors, is subject to revision at all times, and should not be relied upon for any purpose. Under no circumstances shall BFT Financial Group be liable to you or anyone else for damage stemming from the use or misuse of this information. Neither BFT or the author offers legal or tax advice. Please consult the appropriate professional regarding your individual circumstance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Filed Under: News

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

Copyright © 2021 · BFT Financial Group · 2312 School Lane Bedford, TX 76021 · 866-462-3834

Privacy Policy · Check the background of this firm on FINRA's Broker Check · Firm ADV2A

Securities offered through BFT Financial Group, LLC, Member FINRA /SIPC/MSRB. Investment advisory services offered through BFT Financial Group, LLC a registered investment adviser.

This site is published for residents of the United States only. Representatives may only conduct business with residents of the states and jurisdictions in which they are properly registered. Therefore, a response to a request for information may be delayed until appropriate registration is obtained or exemption from registration is determined. Not all of services referenced on this site are available in every state and through every advisor listed. For additional information, please contact Stephen Tally at [email protected]